• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

The Beacon Collaborative HomepageThe Beacon Collaborative

  • About us
    • Introduction
    • The Beacon Manifesto
    • Board of Trustees
    • Funders and partners
    • News & Views
    • Contact us
  • Better philanthropy
    • Talking about philanthropy
    • The philanthropy ecosystem
    • Donor journey
      • How do I get started?
      • Building a strategy for my donor journey
      • What is best practice in philanthropy?
      • Learning from others
      • Accountability
    • Young givers
    • Bridging diversity
    • Barriers to giving
  • Growing giving
    • Beacon Forum
    • Market measurement
    • National strategy
    • Regional philanthropy
  • Data and research
    • HNW giving
    • Reports
  • Stories
    • Philanthropy stories
    • Video interviews
    • Giving Voice to Philanthropy

Beacon Admin

Philanthropy Is About More Than Giving: People Must Work To Change The Foundations

July 19, 2021 by Beacon Admin

Philanthropy Is About More Than Giving: People Must Work To Change The Foundations

This article was written by Mike Schiemer – Find the original here – Republished for Beacon Collaborative with author’s permission.

The best people know when to give to those who need it and lift others up in times of need. However, philanthropy doesn’t work only through generous acts. It must provide real and long-lasting change that makes the world better. These lessons are what true philanthropists like Donald Friese and many others know intuitively.

philanthropy-giving-improve-foundations-give-back-help-society-donate-charity

 

PHILANTHROPY IS MORE THAN GIVING

Those who think philanthropy is measured by dollar amounts often don’t understand the true nature of this process. Philanthropy needs to be transformative and restorative. It must bring something new to the life of those experiencing it and give them new hope and a better lease on life. It doesn’t just give somebody a meal for a day but strives to make it easier for them to eat for the rest of their lives.

Beyond that, it should try to change things at its core level to make the world a better place. True philanthropists look to shake expectations and help people understand suffering. Universal empathy drives true philanthropists and makes them driven to succeed in many unexpected ways, particularly for those who want to improve their community and their nation.

But how can the average person ever reach these lofty levels of expectation? It may seem unfair to expect most people to have that drive and that energy. However, those who truly care about philanthropy do have those drives and do what they can to help change the world and make it stronger. Here are a few different ways you can achieve this goal, beyond writing a cheque to your favourite charity.

 

HOW TO GIVE WHERE IT MATTERS

Thriving as a philanthropist requires a deep understanding of what causes matter to you and taking time to focus on them. Too many people don’t take the time to follow these steps and end up struggling to make things better. Donating money is nice but just isn’t enough for this situation.

As a result, it is important to understand many factors before you try becoming a philanthropist. Remember – you need to be willing to work hard and have a true vision about how you want to change the world. Take these steps, and things should go easier for you:

  • Know What Matters to You – Have you spent the time figuring out what causes are important to you? If not, you need to think long and hard about what matters to you as a person. We all have beliefs, and your philanthropic goals should always align with them for a better chance of success.
  • Find Foundations With Real Experience – Try to give to groups that work to lift people and transform their lives and the power that surrounds them. Those groups focused on real change and sacrifice are the best options for those who want their philanthropy to truly matter.
  • Give Your Time and Energy – Simply donating money to a foundation is rarely enough for a true philanthropist. Most will also spend time in the trenches, working in difficult situations, teaching people how to take care of themselves, and endlessly working to better things.
  • Champion the Best Causes – The world is struggling, and it is only possible to change things at their core by starting at the bottom. Champion those causes that you feel have the best chance of reaching this goal, and you can transform so many lives for the better with ease.

If you ever feel like your efforts are not enough or are not satisfying your needs, it is time to reconsider your approach to helping others in need. Philanthropy shouldn’t just be donating the same money to the same groups without thought. You need to be constantly upgrading your approach to make it more effective.

 

FINDING GREAT PHILANTHROPIC GOALS

Anyone interested in philanthropy needs to spend time researching the options that make the most sense for them. By seeking out those foundations and giving opportunities that truly change the world, it is possible to truly help those in need. It is best to listen to your heart in this situation. Taking into account how you feel and what feels normal and moral will make this process simpler for you. This will all help you in your journey of first-rate philanthropic deeds. It will feel great to give back!


  • Follow Mike Schiemer on Twitter.

Filed Under: Better Philanthropy, Guest voices, How to do it

Philanthropy’s essential role in tackling the Youth Crisis.

July 8, 2021 by Beacon Admin

youth crisis header

Philanthropy’s essential role in tackling the Youth Crisis.

Youth crisis – Young people have been amongst the worst hit by Covid. The demographic is now suffering its second ‘once in a generation’ economic shock. Instrumental in supporting young people during this period have been youth charities like The Prince’s Trust. Kat Farram, Director of Philanthropy at The Prince’s Trust, discusses why philanthropy is proving so crucial to the charity’s work with young people.


What is the Youth Crisis and why does it matter?

Even before Covid hit, we had reason to be concerned about the wellbeing of young people in the UK. Overall, the pace of generational growth in household income – widely taken by experts as a benchmark of day-to-day living standards – has slowed. The present crisis has only intensified the instability that characterises the lives of so many of the UK’s most disadvantaged young people.

All of our lives have been disrupted by the pandemic, but the socioeconomic impact is being felt disproportionately by young people who are suffering their second ‘once in a generation’ economic shock. After the last financial crisis, youth unemployment increased three times more than it did for older age groups, leaving over a million young people out of work by 2011. Today, young people account for three in five job losses experienced since last March. Sadly, we still haven’t seen the worst of the unemployment crisis. 

youth crisis quoteA report by The Prince’s Trust and the Learning and Work Institute warns that young people will increasingly bear the brunt of the disruption to the labour landscape, with youth unemployment set to climb further still throughout 2021. 

Unemployment at the start of a young person’s working life can leave a scar that lasts a lifetime. We already needed to ensure the sustainability of work available, to future-proof jobs and apprenticeships and to adapt our national skillset to meet new opportunities in digital and green industries. Covid-19 has simply accelerated the opportunity to address social mobility and tackle the skills deficit our country faces. If we don’t, there’s a cost to all of us. Indeed, the economic cost of youth unemployment in terms of lost national output is forecast to be £6.9 billion in 2022 alone.

 

How is philanthropy helping The Prince’s Trust to respond to the crisis?

Philanthropy accounts for roughly 30% of The Prince’s Trust’s income. The long-term support of our Patrons means that The Trust can make a sustainable difference to the futures of tens of thousands of young people every year. In the past year, the loyalty of our supporters has granted us the flexibility to adapt our services in response to the pandemic – taking our support online in response to social distancing measures, for example – to ensure we could maintain a strong system of support throughout the crisis.

 

There are several ways philanthropy has enabled us to be there for young people:

 

1. Hyper-local investment

If we are to help young people find sustainable work, we have to tailor our youth work to regional labour landscapes. Many of our philanthropists invest in regions that they have a connection to, from major cities like London, Manchester or Birmingham, to rural and coastal communities. Not only do they provide much-needed investment, but their personal affinity for the community challenges us to adapt our provision to local needs and opportunities. 

One example is our partnership with Hans Bishop and Kate James, who have invested in our work in the Solent. Hans and Kate, who respectively bring a wealth of experience from backgrounds in biotech, edtech and at the Gates Foundation, partnered with us to improve the prospects of more young people locally and grow partnerships with employers in sustainable industries, like healthcare, as well as other sectors at the heart of the Solent’s labour market. This will place us in better stead in the aftermath of the pandemic, as we diversify the opportunities for young people beyond retail, tourism or hospitality. Our relationship with Kate and Hans is testament to the power of the advisory relationship that can come from philanthropic partnerships. 

 

2. Intensive interventions for the hardest-to-reach

The Prince’s Trust believes that a successful society relies on each of its citizens having a stake, but this is only possible if those facing the greatest disadvantage are given the opportunity to succeed. As increasing numbers of ‘work-ready’ young people struggle to secure a job due to fewer vacancies, those already on the fringes of society are being pushed further from the jobs market. To combat this, our brilliant youth support workers provide intensive support to those most-in-need, helping them to develop the confidence and skills to succeed in the long-term. 

  Philanthropists fund the majority of our work with the hardest-to-reach young people – such as those who are homeless, care-leavers, young offenders or those living with learning difficulties. Generally, philanthropists are more willing to invest in these more intensive interventions, which require more time and care to build-up, than funders from the public and corporate sectors. Amongst our supporter-base, there is a consensus that a foundation of confidence and skills is critical in order to take steps towards employment, despite the additional cost this may incur. 

 

3. Investment in infrastructure and sustainability

Increasingly, philanthropists, trusts and foundations are investing in behind-the-scenes projects to strengthen our organisation’s infrastructure and maximise impact. This investment approach to grant-making, which awards funding to strengthen the long-term effectiveness and build the capacity of non-profit institutions, ensures we are able to reach the right demographics of young people, ensure the efficacy of our programmes and secure further funding through more meaningful representations of our impact. 

Investments such as these bring immense value to our organisation and help us to fortify in the long-term at a time when so many third-sector organisations have found themselves at risk.

 

How can you help address the youth crisis?

Organisations working with today’s young people have never been more needed. Amidst a challenging fundraising landscape, strategic investment from philanthropists is key to helping us and others meet the needs of young people. Over the past five years, philanthropy has grown to become one of our dominant income streams. But beyond financial support, philanthropy provides us with creative partnerships that strengthen our organisation by challenging it. 

Youth charities empower young people – often the most vulnerable young people – to pursue opportunities that may otherwise be out of reach. A collaborative approach that involves the government, support agencies and employers really is critical to giving the most disadvantaged young people the best start in life. Philanthropy is an essential part of that collaboration. As we start to look beyond the pandemic, we must offer all the support we can to help every young person become an independent, fulfilled and economically active member of society.


To find out more about The Prince’s Trust’s work and how you can help, please contact Kat Farram, Director of Philanthropy, at kat.farram@princes-trust.org.uk

To learn more about the philanthropy landscape, explore the Beacon Blog.

Filed Under: Guest voices, Themed giving

Crafting a meaningful experience with millennial wealth creators

June 21, 2021 by Beacon Admin

Savanta and the Beacon Collaborative carried out qualitative research with millennial wealth creators around England, Scotland and Wales who are already giving some money, but with the right motivating tools could give more now, or in the future. These are the voices of our #YoungGivers.

It’s something that just resonates with my heart.   London

Just being able to help and raise funds, and know that your money’s going to a good cause and you’re making a difference to people’s lives, makes you feel better about life and less guilty when you’re enjoying your own life.  South West

I feel as well that with small charities, the work they do tends to be a bit more targeted and it’s easier to follow up on your donation, to see exactly where it’s gone and what they are doing.  London

The overall research showed that this generation are, at heart, generous and want to do more. They understand how lucky they are to be in their situation but sometimes the other, seemingly more immediate, pressures of life have to take priority and giving takes a back seat.   However, when challenged to think about giving they are engaged and thoughtful, wanting to know more and make plans that fit into their lifestyle and longer-term family plans.

I think having to think about why you do what you do or what you get from it was quite tricky, I think we all do it to get the satisfaction that you’ve done something good but probably don’t think of it that way unless asked to look deeply.   North

So, what can be done to fit giving into the routine of busy lives, or to motivate these young wealth creators to do more?

In a world dominated by easy access information and short sound bites, charitable organisations can streamline their communications to be front and centre of a potential giver’s thoughts.

We found that charity is thought of as local and personal.  Some charitable activities, notably the arts and advocacy, are not really thought of as charitable when a young wealth creator is making a donation decision.   Sometimes it’s personal as they know someone who has been through a trauma or had a disease.  Sometimes there’s a “there but for the grace go I” empathy.  Charities not on the radar of givers need to do more to show that they are charitable and how they directly impact lives.

However, there is a sense of fatigue at the number of sponsored events that happen, especially in large workplaces and the feeling that then charity is done.  There is also a need to know where the donation will go and that it will be useful, therefore charities that appear wasteful are rejected.

The go-to charities have solid reputations and easy-to-understand messaging.  They produce images and stories that resonate on a personal level.  They show the outputs of their work in smiling faces and stories of named people.  They show the direct impact of a donation to a person or activity that the donor can visualise easily.    They provide tech enabled giving solutions that allow forgive-and-forget giving but that can be the start of regular giving over a long time period.

As yet these busy young people have not had time to fit giving decisions and planning into their lives.  They do think carefully about their environmental impact and the social justice in their surroundings, but it is not associated with “charity” but behaviour and is not part of considering a holistic lifestyle.  However, when their thoughts are provoked, they have the desire to contribute more, on their terms.

Successful interventions fit into their lifestyle and are relevant to professionals on a career path.

So how can charities engage better?

Our participants responded well to…

  • Localised stories where people were humanised, with names and faces
  • Clear objectives and the way that a donation or act creates change with suggested amounts and what that would achieve
  • Tech enabled (text message, direct debit sign up) but not complex methods to give
  • Suggested support beyond the financial – items that people really need that can be donated
  • Something that they can be proud of even if they don’t speak about it

I’m grateful that I’m not in a position that I’ll need to use any of the charities that I donate to or any of the causes.  North

When you’re under real pressure, you don’t think, ‘What I’m going to add to my really busy day is, that I need to do something for charity today.’ It’s usually when you find a gap in your schedule.   South East

I think it would be good for potentially some charities to showcase and highlight ways that people could help them as well, rather than it potentially just being all money.  Scotland

What can charities and their fundraisers do to engage?

  • Help them understand the system – what fundraising is, why capacity building is necessary, how charity structure works
  • Attributing funding to direct actions to direct impact on individuals
  • Celebrate individual contributions
  • Utilise skills and explain the value of them
  • Make it part of a greater plan, for the donor and the charity
  • Use language that is not NGO tech speak but ordinary every day terms that people understand
  • Help make it part of everyday life – fit giving in with all the other activities

I’ve always wondered how people can help a charity through connections and expertise, but the amount of time, it’s almost like another job.   Scotland

You’d feel a bit rewarded, at least you feel a little bit good.   London

At the end of the year, I tend to make a bigger contribution from my own personal money. …..We tend to get a bonus at the end of the year and I really see that as money that I wouldn’t expect to get if I worked for anyone else, so I use a proportion of that, basically, to fund a few charities of my liking.   South West

I had an example of researching a charity, and looked to see from the accounts what the director’s pay was like, and they weren’t all paying themselves a fortune…Looking to see that as much of the money as possible can go to the cause that you’re interested to support. I think it also gives you a feel of the ethos of the charity, you know, are they there for themselves?   South East

What do they want to do and hear?

Views are formed by own experience, use that to harness people’s engagement, both personal and professional: people are much more sympathetic when they see something organically by going through life and have sympathy and anger for the root causes of the issues

They are happy to talk about it if they were part of a team that helped, repeating a story they have heard but less so if they are “just” donors.  So, give them stories that they can remember and tell, and give them pride in their contributions.

Bring together peer donors who don’t know each other – mini giving circles to talk together about doing more and guide the discussion

Be honest about failures as well as successes. If there’s too much hype it becomes unbelievable

Volunteering is seen as a much bigger deal, more serious and a bigger sacrifice than giving money – more thought goes into it. Make volunteering easy, match it to a financial value, match the person to the commitment, then make sure they have stories to tell about volunteering.   Make volunteering a qualification that can be used on a CV, something that can be using professional skills, harness skills that have a value to the charity.

For the long-term future:

Established giving is not aspirational for most people, it’s “almost like another job”.

  • Help them to think of giving as an integral part of their financial planning
  • Provide online tools to calculate what can be given when
  • Make birthday and Christmas gifts more enticing to be done through charities or as donations on others’ behalf
  • Encourage intergenerational conversations about giving and charity
  • Show how much effect long term engagement/multiyear pledges can make to planning and future security

And I think it’s about having that discussion with a financial advisor to say ‘Maybe you can get a return on this, but this is done in a charitable way’, versus, ‘Why don’t you just donate this amount? And, actually, you can offset that against your tax, and this is how you would do it’. So, it’s just putting it in a bit more of a structured way.   South East

The time is now.  These young wealth earners are intelligent and thoughtful, conscious of the issues that surround them but need to be engaged more to enable wider understanding of the interplay between social issues and behaviours and the impact that can be had when acting in a holistic way.  With targeted communications now there is the potential for these young wealth earners to be engaged major donors of the future.

I thought it was a real thought provoking session…..it’s made me want to look into giving and volunteering more than I do.   Southwest

I was going to say actually after this past hour or so I don’t think I am doing enough, I think I could give more.    Scotland

Filed Under: Better Philanthropy, Growing Giving, How to do it

The campaign allowing anyone to become a vaccine philanthropist

June 16, 2021 by Beacon Admin

gogiveone

The campaign allowing anyone to become a vaccine philanthropist

Philanthropy has been – and is continuing to be – an integral part of the Covid recovery. Ultra wealthy individuals have single handedly contributed billions in response to the pandemic. We have also seen increases in UK millionaire giving over the last 12 months.

However, until now the infrastructure needed to engage the vast numbers of people at average wealth levels has not existed.  A new initiative created by the WHO Foundation is seeking to address this through a campaign encouraging everyone to buy vaccines for those in lower-income countries, helping to get the world immunised. We learn how the Go Give One campaign is making vaccine philanthropy accessible.


– by Sarah Lewis and Alex Reid.

The world held its breath last week to see what the G7 would do to help end the pandemic. Unfortunately, G7 leaders didn’t do enough. Amidst the sound bites and lofty talk of future commitments, the actions required now to get vaccines to people all over the world fell short – the funding was too small, dose sharing too slow. 

Speaking earlier in the year at the Rome Global Health Summit, German Chancellor Angela Merkel had raised the question around leadership to ending the pandemic and said, “if not us, then who?”

Well, we believe the answer is “everyone, everywhere”. When it comes to Covid-19, we’re all on the same team. Go Give One was created by the WHO Foundation so that people-powered vaccines could pave the way for an end to this pandemic. With a simple act of donating £4, individuals can cover the cost of a Covid-19 vaccine, helping the world and themselves be free from the virus. The goal is for 50 million people to join the campaign this year. 

In less than two months since launch, Go Give One has raised over $7M USD, helping to buy over 1.4 million new vaccines. The total donations include $1.5M from individual donors with 27% from British givers. Donors were able to leverage company matches, including the challenge set by a coalition of global businesses including Salesforce, Workday, PagerDuty and Russell Reynolds, as well as a fundraising drive by Facebook. The money raised goes to Gavi COVAX AMC – the international finance facility which buys vaccines for the world, prioritising those who need them the most in countries who can’t afford them.

gogiveonescale

Flexible giving options and Match Funding schemes are two features GoGiveOne is using.

In addition to support from global companies, Go Give One partners with local charities and businesses to make the campaign locally driven and locally accountable. This was the impetus behind the Charities Aid Foundation (CAF) coming on board as the UK arm of the campaign, helping to ensure funds raised can leverage Gift Aid in the UK. As a locally trusted organization, CAF brings credibility to the campaign and a stamp of approval for donors, large and small. We hope to follow this example across many countries. 

The connection between local and global is what sets this campaign apart. Both of us spent many years working at global organizations, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Standard Chartered and Xynteo, where we have seen first-hand the power of global campaigns: the coming together of countries and organisations around the Sustainable Development Goals is a great example of what can be done when we focus on our common humanity.

The sense of global solidarity is often a driver of community action by people of faith, something that inspired us both in our recent work with the Vatican Covid-19 Commission. And many people are increasingly drawn to communities outside their national borders that provide a politically neutral common ground, for example in global gamer communities who have raised millions of pounds on platforms like Twitch. 

We’ve also seen the pitfalls of global initiatives that are disconnected from local realities. With experience in our own communities we know that without an understanding of local contexts, campaigns more often than not fail. Because, as Covid has shown us in stark reality over the past year and a half, our experiences are often hyper local, and deeply personal. Go Give One aims to connect with people on their own terms and give them the chance to act in simple ways to free themselves, their colleagues, and their communities, from Covid-19. It is a local act with a global solution. We believe this is what this moment calls for and we hope that the leaders of the G-7 and beyond will take note.

We are attempting to create the foundations for a new approach to philanthropy, an approach which can also help us to tackle other global challenges like climate change and gender equality. An approach that invites everyone – no matter where they live and work in the world – to play their part in the solution. After all, we’re all on the same team. We invite you to Go Give One and join us on our journey.


Go Give One is currently looking for funders, partners and big thinkers who share their core values to help them respond to the immediate challenge of Covid-19. Get in touch with Alex and Sarah here to learn more > alex@reidstrat.com // sarah@reidstrat.com

www.gogiveone.org

Filed Under: Covid

Top 10 needs of millennial donors (and how to meet them)

June 7, 2021 by Beacon Admin

millennial donors header

Top 10 needs of millennial donors

(…and how to meet them)

Download the guidance

Millennials are now becoming established in professional careers and beginning to earn more money. As they become wealthier, it is imperative that we expose them to charitable giving to help them embark on their philanthropic journey.

In April 2021, Beacon and Savanta published the #YoungGivers research to fill the gap in knowledge about their philanthropy. Funded by Arts Council England, the research sought to shed light on the giving habits and attitudes of wealthy young people from around the UK.

We learnt that much of what we assumed about their philanthropic activity is wrong. Instead of developing long-term strategies, they largely give in the moment; they see technology as a shortcut for ‘real’ interaction, not a replacement; they don’t use words like ‘impact’ in the same way that charities do.

We realised that charities could improve their interactions with young donors if they understood the needs of this demographic better. In this infographic, based on our insights from the #YoungGivers research, we explore the Top 10 things we learned about millennial donors and suggest how you can meet their needs.

Filed Under: Better Philanthropy, Growing Giving, How to do it

Reinventing philanthropy for today | Our Common Good

June 2, 2021 by Beacon Admin

Reinventing philanthropy for today.

We learn about a concept seeking to change the way Britain thinks about giving in response to a growing need for renewal and regeneration.

A new charitable body is looking to reignite Britain’s philanthropic tradition, leveraging the money, skills, networks and knowledge of wealthy individuals, foundations and corporations to catalyse social change in some of the country’s most socially excluded communities.

our common good founders

John Nickson (left) and Paul Donovan, the co-founders of Our Common Good.

The initiative – Our Common Good – is the brainchild of philanthropists John Nickson and Paul Donovan, and began in 2018. Its goal is:

“…to help create a more cohesive, equitable and prosperous society through new philanthropic and social investment in Britain’s left behind communities. By creating positive social impact via local projects that can be scaled up and replicated elsewhere, we can demonstrate what is possible and thereby promote innovative best practice and influence national policy”.

Emerging from what John calls a ‘pilot and private phase funded by us’, Our Common Good has already co-created and supported five transformative community projects. In this article, we speak to the founders to take you through the journey of Our Common Good – from inception to fruition – and how philanthropy can help to stimulate and find innovative and sustainable solutions to societal problems that are beyond the capacity of the state or any of the sectors acting on their own.

How did the idea emerge?

John Nickson is a fundraiser turned philanthropist. He was director of fundraising for some of Britain’s leading national institutions, including the British Council, English National Opera, Royal Academy of Arts and Tate.

our common good logoAfter retiring from Tate he began giving and campaigning to increase philanthropy in Britain. Encouraged by the philanthropists he had worked with – themselves frustrated at the lack of a philanthropic culture in modern Britain – John wrote two books extolling philanthropy.

The second of these, Our Common Good, which lends its name to the new initiative, emerged from a conversation between John and a leading philanthropist in 2014:

“We were talking about how philanthropy could contribute to the regeneration of the Olympic site in east London. He commented on the emerging dynamic that state funds were dwindling while the demands on the not-for-profit sector increased. He said a new mindset and template were needed.  It’s an issue that I couldn’t get out of my mind. I started asking myself the question – if the state provides less, who will provide more?”

our common good bookIn pursuit of an answer, John’s research led to conversations with over a hundred people around the country, looking at how local collaboration, underpinned by a solid philanthropic catalyst, could provide a valuable and increasingly essential complement to government funding and make a demonstrable and sustainable social impact.

He wrote about Onside Youth Zones as a prime example of philanthropy convening local forces and redefining the relationship between the public, private and not-for-profit sectors. Initially based in Bolton, it was this collaborative strategy that helped Onside Youth Zones to become a national charity.

John’s book found its way into the hands of Paul Donovan, a highly respected CEO whose various corporate posts have seen him turn around the fortunes of a number of household brand names. Inspired, Paul connected with John and the duo decided to combine their skills and resources to put the book’s theory into practice.

The new initiative is named after John’s second book, above.

How does Our Common Good work?

What distinguishes Our Common Good is its holistic approach. While it is influenced by methodologies such as asset-based community development and participatory grant-making, its venture philanthropy model enables innovation, experimentation and taking considered risks with pilot programmes that have the potential to grow.

Our Common Good’s aim is to drive sustainable social impact by creating strong networks of local organisations, councils and other stakeholders across the sectors. The partners agree to focus upon specific challenges and to collaborate in order to solve them. Our Common Good provides seed funding and also professional advice, thereby helping to build the capacity of smaller charities.

Further injections of philanthropic funding or social investment are sought after the projects have been defined with the aim that they will ultimately become self-sustaining and be entirely owned by the community, charity or social enterprise running them. The intention is that community networks will grow beyond the bounds of their initial projects, inspiring local collaboration for other regeneration projects in the future.

Our Common Good also wants to influence national policy. The government’s recent ‘Levelling-Up’ agenda demonstrates that the ground may be fertile for such an initiative, inspiring a rethink of how we support historically neglected communities. Says John,

“People are finally waking-up to the fact that some of our towns and cities have fallen way behind more prosperous parts of the country and that there are also hidden depths of poverty within wealthy counties. By proving that our concept works, we can change the way the public sector thinks about supporting local communities. By working with others, the public sector can become an enabler as well as a provider. We can also demonstrate to philanthropists and other funders that through collaboration they can help to enable positive and sustainable social change.”

The founders are passionate believers that people know the solutions to their own problems and that enabling them to realise these solutions is where the focus should be. But despite Our Common Good’s encouraging start, the duo remain realists. Paul speaks to this:

“Our venture philanthropy model allows us to innovate and experiment, take considered risks and learn from pilot programmes so that they can be developed, replicated  and expanded. We know we will fail sometimes, but that is to be expected. In fact, if we’re not failing from time to time, we’re probably not working hard enough to push the boundaries of new ideas.”

What are the current projects?

Our Common Good has developed five pilot schemes across the UK so far. We look at two of these:

Growing Minds

growing mindsThe first project established by Our Common Good is ‘Growing Minds’, a pilot initially developed and operating in Oxfordshire, designed to tackle educational inequality in rural parts of the county. It aims to ensure that young children enter primary education on a par with their middle class peers rather than being up to five months behind and never catching up. The concept emerged from discussions with Oxfordshire Community Foundation and other local organisations to determine priority needs. Says John,

“Because Oxfordshire is such a wealthy county, people often consider that it doesn’t have any poverty or educational disparity. Regrettably, this isn’t true; the poverty is simply more invisible. According to the latest indices of Multiple Deprivation in 2019, Oxfordshire has 17 neighbourhood areas among the 20% most deprived nationally, an increase from 13 in 2015.”

Following consultations, Our Common Good funded the appointment of a manager to research, develop and define a project. The project manager brought together a delivery team of ten local organisations, including charities and local and statutory authorities to run the project under the umbrella of Oxfordshire Community Foundation.

Our Common Good has proved that it is possible to persuade ten organisations to abandon their silos and work together with a single aim.  Throughout its seven year duration, the project will support over 800 young children and their families, helping to improve primary school readiness in some of Oxfordshire’s poorest communities. As a result of progress to date, Growing Minds is now being adopted in other parts of the country.

Community Larders

A second project being incubated by Our Common Good is Community Larders, a social enterprise and community-based membership programme operated by SOFEA, a food and education charity.

Drawing on SOFEA’s food surplus operation, in partnership with FareShare, the Larders address food insecurity for those struggling to make ends meet. Members can save up to £150 on their monthly food bill.

community larderBut the Larders provide more than discounted food. Working with local partners in community centres and churches, Larders provide a space where people can meet knowing they will be treated with dignity and respect.  Additional support is available to address low-level mental health concerns, finance and debt advice, working with Nationwide to set up bank accounts and ensuring that members get the lowest tariffs on utilities. A digital inclusion programme is now also starting and there are plans to bring in employability courses to help people into work.

With Our Common Good’s funding and strategic advice, the scheme has grown from one larder to 17, with another 19 in the pipeline. Again, the aim here is to use a replicable model to inspire a larger roll out across other parts of country. As Paul explains, generating community collaboration and local pride is key to success for the Larders: 

“The membership scheme is vital so that people know they are not receiving charity. Instead they feel invested because they are participating in a fair transaction for their groceries while helping to tackle the issue of food waste. This creates a sense of pride in belonging to a Larder.”

What’s next for Our Common Good?

Since beginning just three years ago, Our Common Good has created and transformed social change projects in a number of communities across Britain. The concept is proving successful in highlighting that place-based regeneration requires a combination of philanthropic investment, strategic management advice, skills development, cross-sector partnerships and strong, durable networks. Moreover, the first £95,000 donated by John and Paul has leveraged a further £800,000 in funding from other sources.

The principle that really makes the concept stand out as a fresh approach to philanthropy is its commitment to curate community networks. This aspect lays the ground for project-based solutions to social problems to take root and flourish.

Our Common Good continues to work on its five current projects, providing funding, advice and connections to help them scale. John, Paul and executive director Paddy Radcliffe are now seeking donors, partners and collaborators to help them incubate more projects across the UK as part of their journey to take Our Common Good national and reinvent philanthropy for today.


Filed Under: Better Philanthropy

How businesses can inspire millennial philanthropy

May 21, 2021 by Beacon Admin

millennial philanthropy header

 

How businesses can inspire millennial philanthropy

A ‘cheat sheet’ showing four actionable ways businesses can stimulate charitable giving from the next generation.

Download the guidance

Research published by Beacon Collaborative and Savanta in April 2021 filled a gap in knowledge about millennial philanthropy. The report revealed insights into the ways wealthy young people give and their attitudes towards philanthropy.

One revelation was that young people – who are still overwhelmingly in the money-making phase of their careers – feel anxious about giving big amounts of money to charity. However, they do show great enthusiasm for being engaged in philanthropy in ways which are convenient and are proportionate to their wealth level. Many participants told us they would value their employer making it easier for them to give.

Initiatives such a match-funding drives, payroll giving and strong business-charity relationships were celebrated by our young givers. Based on their feedback, we have collated a one-page ‘cheat-sheet’ for businesses, explaining four implementable steps they can take to increase millennial philanthropy.

Our research suggests that following these steps will lead to happier and more engaged young employees, who feel enabled and encouraged to embark on their philanthropic journey.

Filed Under: Better Philanthropy, Growing Giving, How to do it

4 ways tech can help first-time donors

May 10, 2021 by Beacon Admin

 

4 ways tech can help first-time donors

In the past few years there’s been an evolution in the way that we make charitable donations thanks to developments in data and tech.

According to Enthuse’s quarterly research study, 67% of the public say they are likely to give in the next 12 months. With this large percentage of people making a commitment to give, it is possible that we will see more first-time donors embarking on their philanthropic journey.

Navigating philanthropy and identifying the right causes to give to can seem like a minefield when you’re first starting out. But with the explosion of data and tech-powered tools, there’s a light at the end of the tunnel. 

Here are four ways data and tech can help you to get started on your philanthropy journey.

 

1. Empowering anyone to be a donor

Philanthropy has often been considered an activity for the rich and retired, but the rise in digital giving platforms means it’s now for everyone. Platforms like Just Giving, Virgin Money Giving and Localgiving make it easier than ever to donate money digitally, while many charities also have their own online fundraising technology.

virginmoneygivingThese platforms are also responsible for a shift in the way we define philanthropy. While many of us might think of philanthropy only as donating large sums of money regularly, digital platforms are making giving more accessible to everyone – no matter their budget.

Alliance magazine reported that in 2020 giving grew by 10% in the US, thanks to an increase in small donors. Perhaps we will see the UK follow this trend. With online donation platforms philanthropy can be big or small, frequent or infrequent, and most importantly, it can reach all new demographics.

New giving platforms can allow you to dip your toe in the water by starting your giving at a lower, more manageable amount and increasing as and when you feel comfortable to do so.

 

2. Identifying the right causes to support

When you start your giving journey, it can be difficult to know what causes you should focus on. Do you support the causes closest to your heart? Or do you look at the data for funding shortfalls in specific areas?

brevioLuckily, there are now a number of platforms and services that can help you decide where to direct your focus. For example, Brevio – a grant-building platform – has a range of research tools which let philanthropists set up their own fund and gain real-time insights on where the current funding need is.

Corporate giving platforms like Benevity, Neighbourly and Semble showcase charitable projects that are looking for funding. And for comprehensive data on current funding needs, New Philanthropy Capital has developed a data dashboard that captures the locations most affected by Covid-19, as well as the level of demand for charities across the UK.

Using innovative solutions like these can show you which areas are currently underfunded and/or overwhelmed with demand for their services, ensuring you support places which will most value your contribution.

 

3. Providing better oversight & accountability

In recent years, there’s been a strong trend towards greater transparency and accountability for charities. In the US, platforms like Give Well and Charity Navigator provide detailed ratings on charities by assessing data on their programs and impact to help users find trustworthy charities to support.

charity commissionLocally, the Charity Commission’s online register provides detailed information on all charities registered in England and Wales, including financial details. You can find similar information on charities in Northern Ireland via Charity Commission NI and via OSCR for Scotland. 

If you’re thinking about supporting a particular charity, it’s always good to do your research beforehand and these digital registers make it much easier.

Feeling comfortable that charities are using your contributions responsibly is one of the biggest factors for a good giving experience. Refer to the Charity Commission’s website for clear and direct financial data about charities you wish to support.

 

4. Tracking the difference you make.

Better data is providing greater opportunity to track the impact that your funding has made. Organisations like 360 Giving are leading the way in sharing data within the third sector. Through collecting and publishing data on what was funded, 360 Giving has established the #OpenGrants movement. This helps philanthropists see where their funds are going and where funding might still be needed. 

From the charity perspective, So Give is another platform that aims to measure impact across the sector. So Give helps charities track their own impact and provides information on what impact your funding actually makes. For example, their research shows exactly how many children are able to be treated with anti-malaria medication based on the amount of money donated to the Malaria Consortium.

Ambiguity around the impact of your donation can lead to unfulfilling giving experiences. Exploring independent services like 360 Giving and So Give will allow you to draw the cause and effect line for your philanthropy.

 

What does the future hold for tech in philanthropy?

This is just the start of how tech and data can help first-time donors. The tech space is evolving and innovating at a rapid pace. The explosion of new platforms for digital fundraising, corporate giving and grant applications is helping to build an online ‘funding marketplace’.

While usually it is up to charities to search for and apply for available funding, newer approaches are emerging which will give charities the chance to showcase their projects and their funding requirements to potential funders. This inverse approach lets potential funders and first-time donors be more proactive in their giving by seeking out charities they’d like to partner with.

Perhaps in the future we will see the funding marketplace develop a ‘Netflix-style’ solution where users can browse and fund projects based on common interests and categories. With tech and data pushing the boundaries in the third sector, first time donors have an abundance of tools at their fingertips to help them get started on their philanthropic journey.

 


About Brevio

Brevio empowers the charitable sector to achieve more. We automate the initial steps in grant applications, to free up hundreds of millions of pounds every year in administration. We’re a matching platform that links funders and charities based on the impact they both want to achieve. Find out more about Brevio here and follow @hellobrevio on Twitter for updates.

brevio

Filed Under: Better Philanthropy, Growing Giving, Guest voices, How to do it

Meet the experts engaging millennials in philanthropy

April 16, 2021 by Beacon Admin

 

Meet the experts engaging young wealth holders in philanthropy.

A new generation of young wealth holders is becoming increasingly aware of the amazing role charitable giving can play in making change happen. In fact, Beacon research recently identified that the millennial age group had the highest median donation level of any demographic at the start of the UK’s first lockdown.

Despite this, most wealthy millennials are still at the start of their giving journey and many lack the experience and confidence to take their giving to the next step. With this in mind, new organisations are helping millennials to bridge the knowledge gap and develop a greater understanding of philanthropy.

We spoke to Yasmin Ahammad, Jade Brudenell and Kydd Boyle to learn about the giving barriers of young wealth holders and how these can be overcome.


Yasmine Ahammad, Climate Advocacy and Philanthropy Manager, Impatience Earth

Impatience Earth offers philanthropy advice services pro-bono to wealthy individuals and foundations who are new to funding climate causes or looking to increase their giving to the climate sector. While not explicitly targeted at the younger generation of donors, their combination of education, advice and peer-to-peer support is particularly resonant for those looking to take their first steps into giving.

How do young wealth holders engage with the course?

Like donors of any age, we encourage younger clients to spend time building up their confidence and expertise around the climate crisis so they can make informed decisions on how to channel their funding in a way that feels meaningful and impactful to them. We help them learn about the climate emergency and how their money can lead to significant positive change through workshops, meetings with experts and introductions to co-funders. Part of our approach is to help donors explore how climate change compounds existing social inequalities, and young people seem to be particularly adept at understanding this.

We have also noticed that younger donors are excited to work in peer-to-peer learning networks and to share ideas. If we can encourage them to create lasting peer networks, we think this will lead to a sustained uptick in climate philanthropy.

Are there barriers to engaging young donors in climate philanthropy?

The most common barrier is that they are initially overwhelmed by the scale of the climate crisis. When young donors see the amount of work required to mitigate the effects of climate change, they often wonder if their donation will simply be a drop in the ocean.

This concern is usually overcome when we show them the inspiring real-world impacts that even a relatively small donation can have. Once they understand this, their despair turns to optimism and a ‘roll your sleeves up’ attitude. This is why it is so essential to demonstrate impact for people early-on in their giving journey; they need to know they are making a difference in order to continue giving.

What pointers would you give to young people looking to get involved in philanthropy?

You have the opportunity to play a catalysing role in making change happen. It’s far easier to start giving than you think and you don’t have to do it alone – there is plenty of help out there, including our pro-bono support. There is the opportunity to engage with peers of your age-group who are on the same journey. 

Also, there is a misconception that you need lots of money to make a big difference – this isn’t true. Even small, regular contributions can support incredible climate-saving initiatives, especially in the Global South. And it’s better to start now and learn along the way – the biggest risk is doing nothing at all.

Visit Impatience Earth – Yasmin Ahammad on Twitter


Jade Brudenell, founder, The Conservation Collective

The Conservation Collective is a network of funds around the world which are using philanthropic donations to help protect and preserve the natural environment. They exist to enable local communities to maximise their positive environmental impact.

How do you get young wealth holders engaged in conservation?

Many young donors have never given to the environment before. If you suggest getting involved in, for example, stopping deforestation, they often think “wow, that’s huge. That’s a job for the UN, not for me.” But if you say “have you noticed a lack of insect life in your local area?” they start to become intrigued and far more receptive.

It’s the visual, small-scale initiatives that make early-stage donors want to get involved, because they can envisage that their money will have an impact. A good example is something like a seabin, which goes into a port and collects rubbish from the surface of the water. Even though its impact is nominal and its use is typically more to do with raising awareness than true conservation net gain, it’s a fantastic way to begin conversations with new donors.

We see ourselves as a gateway drug, attracting donors with ‘quick-win, small-scale’ projects and guiding them down the road to more strategic and long-term programmes designed for systemic impact.

Are young donors more hesitant around giving money?

It depends on each giver’s personal situation. That said, the younger group is definitely an interesting one. One of our funds currently under development is looking at the possibility of setting up a young donor sub-group. This is because many young donors want to get involved in causes but don’t yet feel they can give much money.

The sub-group will look at other ways they can contribute while donating a more modest amount of money. A lot of the time, young people don’t realise that abilities they have developed at university – say accountancy or law – can also hold huge value for a network like ours. The idea is to get people involved at a level they feel comfortable with, and develop long-term, highly fruitful relationships which contribute considerably to conservation efforts.

Visit Conservation Collective – Conservation Collective on Twitter


Kydd Boyle, co-founder, Horizons 

Horizons is a global network of millennial investors looking to connect, share opportunities and have impact together. With most of the community coming from wealth-owning families, many in the network want to integrate positive social impact into their own investment and leadership style. They are keen to learn from experts and from each other, as they recognise that they have outsized potential to have a positive impact on society.

In your experience, are young donors focused on a specific issue?

There are a range of different interests between our members, but the common denominator is the desire use their wealth for good. Taking a meta-view, I would say mental health, decarbonisation and diversity are the most poignant themes for our community members. 

What works to engage young wealth holders in philanthropy?

We believe in encouraging people to understand their own values and the issues that are most important to them, and then empowering them to feel like they can be a part of the solution. Too often individuals are reactive when it comes to their philanthropy not proactive, this can lead to a sentimental rather than strategic decision-making process – which ultimately limits the scale of their giving. 

What is the biggest barrier to young people giving?

Few of our network members have the autonomy to give away meaningful sums from their own pockets – it is largely money from a family fund that they are distributing. Sometimes there are competing priorities between the older generations of the family and the young donors, so that can be tricky.

There are still many young and wealthy people who are not really doing anything philanthropic at the moment. That’s not because they don’t want to, but because they don’t know the first step to take. In my mind this is a huge opportunity for the charity sector to build new and effective long-term engagement strategies for potential donors. Getting this right would bring infinite possibilities. 

What lessons should young wealth holders learn to get more involved in philanthropy?

Meeting a peer group is absolutely vital for both philanthropy and investing. If you go it alone, it can feel like you’re venturing out into the wilderness and it’s difficult to know who to trust. Becoming part of a community allows you to build relationships with people that have shared interests and circumstances. Try to lean on friendship to lean into philanthropy. This builds lasting foundations and an intent to do more – together.

A good example of this is Big Change, who we recently partnered with. Founded amidst the London riots, a group of six millennial philanthropists threw ideas at a white board for how they could genuinely help. They quickly concluded that education was the root cause of all the inequity they saw around them and began a shared mission to look at the problem differently. After false starts, pivots and lessons learned, today Big Change invests in nascent educational ideas and organisations that have the potential to change the sector. To me, this exemplifies the impact young donors can have when working together.

There is an oft-quoted proverb, “If you want to go fast, go alone, if you want to go far, go together”. My biggest piece of advice for prospective young donors is to connect with like-minded individuals and hatch plans together.

Visit Horizons – Kydd Boyle on Twitter


These examples highlight that while young wealth owners may have a strong interest in social impact, they still need support and help to realise their potential. The future of philanthropy is in their hands and meeting their needs for knowledge, peer support and tangible impact is an investment in that future.

On April 22nd, Beacon is launching brand new research into the attitudes of wealthy millennials towards philanthropy. Find out more and join the launch event here.

Filed Under: Better Philanthropy, Growing Giving, How to do it

Impact Investing and the Three Dimensions of Capital – Part 3 of 3 from the Understanding Impact Investing series

March 26, 2021 by Beacon Admin

In a series of three articles, Scott Greenhalgh*, former executive chair of Bridges Evergreen Holdings, will share his thoughts on the landscape for impact investing in the UK. In this third and final article, Scott looks in more depth at the distinction between finance-first and impact-first equity investing.

* See bottom for more on the author

Start the series here


Impact Investing and the Three Dimensions of Capital

In previous articles, we have defined impact investing as: “investments made into companies, organisations and funds with the intention to generate positive, measurable social and environmental impact alongside a financial return”1. We have also touched on the distinction between finance-first and impact-first investment strategies.

This article describes how different impact fund managers prioritise issues of impact, risk and return (the three dimensions of capital). It also explores impact-related themes a potential investor might wish to explore, with a company or impact fund manager, before deciding whether or not to invest.

The Spectrum of Capital shown below2  places all investment on a continuum between “traditional” investments at one end (those that seek to maximise risk-adjusted returns with no consideration of wider social or environmental factors) and philanthropy (that seeks only impact and no financial return). This approach positions ethical, sustainable and impact investing on that continuum and allows us to distinguish between impact investing that is finance-first, meaning it aims to deliver impact with no sacrifice of market-rate financial returns, and impact-first, where the investor accepts lower, risk-adjusted returns.

Figure 1: Impact Investing Institute’s Spectrum of Capital.

impact investing

 

Finance First

A number of venture capital and private equity funds take a finance-first approach to impact investing. Such funds invest in businesses and aim to achieve market-rate financial returns for the investor at the same time as achieving positive social and/or environmental outcomes. Examples in the UK mid-market include Palatine Impact and Bridges Sustainable Growth Funds. There are an increasing number of impact funds offered by the large investment firms such as TPG, KKR and Bain Capital. There are also a number of “tech for good” early-stage impact investors like Mustard Seed, for example. 

The alignment between commercial and impact success is often referred to as lockstep in the impact investing industry. By way of a simple example, a learning support business that provides high-quality, educational materials to schools might be considered to offer lockstep. Put simply, the more it sells to schools, the more children benefit from the materials. In this way, commercial growth is aligned with greater social benefits. The lockstep argument allows businesses to maximise profits, and investors to maximise returns, while achieving positive societal and/or environmental impact.

The finance-first approach applies mainly to profit with purpose private company investing. A 2017 Stanford paper looked at the impact/return profile of investing in social enterprises and found that high-impact social enterprises (as opposed to for-profit businesses), whether in emerging or developed markets, were unlikely to generate more than low single digit financial returns.3

The EVPA characterises finance-first investors as investing with impact. In this definition, the investor will prioritise financial return over impact at each stage of the investment cycle. Therefore, from initial screening through to decisions as to which buyer should be selected on exit, the key metric for the investor is to maximise the financial return.

To return to the school learning materials example above, a finance-first investor would favour private school customers if these paid higher prices than state school ones. If we assume more state school pupils are likely to come from less advantaged households, then the finance-first approach leads to some trade-off in the amount of impact. 

A finance-first approach can be described as “maximising” equity return, consistent with mainstream private equity and venture capital investing. In a 10-year fund structure, a five-year investment horizon is typical. Two consequences of this are worth highlighting. First, the investor will be concerned to drive fast growth from the outset of the investment and second, where possible, to use leverage in order to reach the desired financial return.

As I set out in the next section, there are increasing concerns about potential adverse consequences of this investment approach, for example in the provision of public services by the private sector.

 

Impact First

Impact-first investors focus on achieving a “sufficient” rather than a “maximised” financial return. They therefore also give equal or greater weighting to impact as to risk and return considerations.

What constitutes a sufficient return and how sufficient is defined will be subjective and will vary. For example, the fund I ran aimed for, and was achieving, a 9% net return to investors per annum. At the same time, we took the view that the level of return should not involve having to compromise on the level of positive impact. 

Let me give an example. In November 2020, the Children’s Commissioner published a report on private provision of children’s care services in England, raising concerns about the high profits and high debt levels of some private-equity owned companies providing these public services.4

By way of context, there are some 74,000 looked-after children in England, a number that has risen by over 20% in the last decade. This increase in “need” has mostly been provided by private, for-profit business and the private sector now accounts for some 35% of total provision, with local authorities and charities providing the balance. 

A number of the larger foster and residential care providers are private equity owned. Private equity funds typically target financial returns on equity above 20% per annum. Achieving these returns requires some combination of tight cost control, rapid “buy or build” growth and the use of leverage.

Using Ofsted inspection ratings as a guide, most of these providers deliver a good standard of care. To my mind however, the key question is: could these entities provide even better care (and outcomes for vulnerable children), if they were seeking profit sufficiency rather than profit maximisation? This question is, of course, contentious and loaded with value-based judgments, but I would argue it is a debate that we should have, as at its heart it is about our societal values. 

In January this year, the Secretary of State for Education announced a review into children’s care. It will be interesting to see whether or not this review engages with these issues.

I have used the children’s care sector as an example, but the issues raised apply equally to many aspects of care and other forms of public service delivery by the private sector. Part of the answer, I believe, lies in how impact is defined, measured and reported on.

 

The Impact Process and Impact Risk

The initial screening of an investment opportunity will consider the following and, in the case of impact-first investors, the investment will only proceed if the impact assessment proves acceptable across the following areas:

    • the ethos and values of the company and its mission,
    • the scale and depth of the impact and the impact score (perhaps using the IMP framework5),
    • its ambitions and plans to drive greater impact (perhaps using a Theory of Change model),
    • its willingness to measure impact and how that will be done,
    • the opportunity for the investor to enhance the impact (referred to as the investors’ additionality).  

During the investment period, the investor and the company will then continue to measure and track the change in impact.

Of note, one theme common across the impact investment sector is how few investors use independent assessments to measure impact during the investment period. Genuine independent evaluation of impact can be time-consuming and costly to procure, but arguably it should be done to avoid the risk of “marking one’s own homework”. 

At the point of exit too, life is somewhat easier for the finance-first investor. If there is genuine lockstep, then commercial and impact success are intertwined. Logically, this means that any buyer will seek to preserve that lockstep. This means the seller can sell to the highest bidder.

However, where lockstep does not exist- such as in the children’s care example above- the investor needs to consider carefully which buyer is most likely to preserve the mission of the business and the extent of any trade-offs between preservation of that mission, by selling to a like-minded buyer, and the potential to achieve a higher sale price and hence investor return by selling to a more commercially focused buyer.

Another area to consider are the incentives for the fund manager and its investment team. Carried interest or profit share is standard in private equity or venture capital funds. Management fees are also standard and paid as a percentage of assets under management. One issue for investors to consider is the extent to which these incentives are based on impact as opposed to financial performance.

 

Risk-Adjusted Returns

The Spectrum of Capital above refers to impact-first investing as accepting lower risk-adjusted returns. My view is that this is only partially correct. Some impact-first funds adopt a strategy of taking greater investment risk in return for seeking greater impact return.  Others do not. 

If we again use the children’s care example above, we can say that an impact-first investor that invests in a care provider will seek business growth at a pace that is consistent with the highest quality of care rather than one that is (at least in part) driven by financial return targets.

This allows more room to focus on the quality of care, staffing, resilience and risk management in all its forms. The lens of “sufficient” profit and financial return therefore arguably reduces operational and reputational risk. It also allows for leverage to be used less and perhaps also for the ownership of the company to be spread more widely. All of these factors should help reduce the investment’s risk profile, meaning that whilst the investor return is lower in absolute terms, it can remain attractive and even competitive on a risk-adjusted basis. 

In this article, I have outlined both the finance-first and impact-first approaches to investing and described some of the fault-lines between the two.  Each approach has its own and absolutely legitimate place on the spectrum of capital. Where lockstep exists, positive impact and profit maximisation can go hand-in-hand. In other cases, I believe an impact-first, or profit sufficiency, approach may be more appropriate and still offer attractive risk-adjusted returns to the investor.

I expect to see considerable growth in the finance-first segment of the impact investing landscape as more of the mainstream fund managers launch later-stage and buy-out style impact funds. 

As will be clear from the above, I also believe that there is a real need for the impact-first segment, both early-stage and growth capital, to flourish. To do this, there is a need both for more capital and for more support from investors who themselves have been successful entrepreneurs and wish not only to invest, but also help build exemplar socially-driven businesses.


Footnotes:

1. Global Impact Investing Network in 2009.

2. See Impact Investing Institute- www.impactinvest.org.uk.

3. “Marginalised Returns” Stanford Social Innovation Review 2017, Bolis and West.

4. Children’s Commissioner “Private provision in children’s social care” November 2020.

5. See www.impactmanagementproject.com.


About Scott Greenhalgh: After a career in private equity, Scott started working 12 years ago with a number of wonderful not-for-profit organisations that opened his eyes to the scale of social inequality and need in the UK. In 2016, he was fortunate to be able to combine these “two worlds” and lead Bridges Evergreen Holdings from inception. Evergreen is the UK’s first long-term capital investment vehicle for social impact investing. Scott is now stepping down from this role and this series of articles offer reflections on leading a pioneering impact first fund. The views in this article are the author’s own and expressed in a personal capacity.

Filed Under: Giving vehicles, Growing Giving, How to do it, Impact investing

Your philanthropic journey: what we can learn from the father of modern philanthropy.

March 15, 2021 by Beacon Admin

Your philanthropic journey:

What we can learn from the father of modern philanthropy, Andrew Carnegie.

Written by Ben Morton Wright. More about the author at bottom.


At the beginning of the year, Elon Musk made waves on Twitter when he tweeted, “Btw, critical feedback is always super appreciated, as well as ways to donate money that really make a difference (way harder than it seems).” We often think of the donor journey from the perspective of fundraising but what about the philanthropic journey? How many potential philanthropists feel like Elon Musk, that it’s harder than it seems to donate money?

Your philanthropic journey: it might not be a journey of time and space, but it can be one of the most enjoyable journeys you take. Whether you are at the start of your journey or are further down the path, there are steps which can be taken to increase the enjoyment in giving. No matter how you measure your philanthropy, the ultimate measure should be that your philanthropic giving is the best thing that you have ever done. 

 

5 lessons we have learned about the importance of philanthropy 

There has never been a better or more important time to have this discussion. This is philanthropy’s moment – and it is a needed moment – the world events of the last year have been profound and what has become very evident is why philanthropy is important. 5 lessons we learned in the last year are:

    1. We are all interdependent in a way that we hadn’t appreciated before.
    2. We have learnt how important philanthropy is and will be in our response to national and global crises.
    3. We now have much higher levels of inequality between the wealthy and poor across the world.
    4. The largest intergenerational wealth transfer ever is just about to happen.
    5. Governments across the world simply will not be able to do it all – philanthropy will have a critical role.

 

What can we learn from history’s greatest philanthropist?

Andrew Carnegie was one of the most successful businessmen and most recognised philanthropists in history. “He may be the most influential philanthropist in American history. The scale of his giving is almost without peer: adjusted for inflation, his donations exceed those of virtually everyone else in the [US] nation’s history.” (Philanthropy Roundtable)

Photo Source: The Carnegie Corporation of New York

As Carnegie put it, “It is more difficult to give money away intelligently than to earn it in the first place.” Having worked closely with philanthropists from around the world with net worths from a few million to several billion; I have observed that the best drivers for philanthropy come from within – it is not something you can rush and it takes time to get it right.

In Carnegie’s Gospel of Wealth, he discusses what he sees as the increasing gap between the wealthy and the poor with the growth in industrialisation. He sees this gap as being a natural part of innovation and modernisation, however, he also believed that “surplus wealth is a sacred trust which its possessor is bound to administer in his lifetime for the good of the community.” Carnegie had the insight to see how philanthropy could help close the gap and lift-up the poor which would thus lift everyone up in society. This has similar parallels to the inequality we are seeing today, and philanthropy can have the same level of impact as in Carnegie’s time.

In my view, there are 3 critical drivers which maximise impact for the philanthropist:

    1. Be creative.
    2. Regard how you give as an investment.
    3. Giving should be the best thing you ever do.

Carnegie, who died well over 100 years ago, knew how to tap into the above internal drivers and even now we can see the impact his philanthropic contributions have made. Let’s look at these three drivers one-by-one:

 

1. Be creative with your giving strategies

Spend time to think creatively about where and how you would like to give. What personal experiences or values connect with certain areas of philanthropic need? When we look at Carnegie’s legacy, you can see his creativity in the development of libraries across America. 

“Carnegie is best known for the nearly 3,000 public libraries he helped build. As a young man in Allegheny City, Carnegie spent most of his evenings at the library of Col. James Anderson, a prosperous local businessman who gave working boys free access to his 1,500-volume library. It was clearly a formative experience, and one which [Carnegie] hoped might be of similar benefit to others.” (Philanthropy Roundtable)

 

2. Regard how you give as an investment

Philanthropy is an investment of your resources and, when done correctly, it has a positive emotional response. Consider who you want to give to and what you want to give. You then need to think about how you would like to give. You can deploy much of the same tools of investing to philanthropy in order to do it well.  If you were investing your money into a company, you might ask – 

    • Is this business sound? Is this the best organisation for my investment?
    • How can I deploy the money, so it is well spent?
    • How can I evaluate the success of my investment / gift?

When we look at Carnegie’s investment into public libraries, we see that he took the same approach as a business investment. “Starting in 1885, Carnegie began funding the construction of thousands of libraries… To ensure that communities were equally invested, he would only pay for buildings—and only after local authorities showed him credible plans for acquiring books and hiring staff.” (Philanthropy Roundtable)

You should feel good about who you give to and how your gift is used. This takes some time, research, and evaluation to figure out – just like a business investment would.

 

3. Giving should be the best thing you ever do

Your philanthropic journey should instil a sense of pride, the gifts you give should give you a sense of accomplishment and add to your happiness. Your giving strategy should not be out of a sense of guilt or because you feel pressured to give to a certain cause. In my experience, the best way to counter guilt-giving is to do a deep dive into your personal profound drivers.

Ask yourself – 

    • What am I about? 
    • What are my values? 
    • What am I passionate about?
    • What causes do I gravitate towards? Why?
    • How could I express myself philanthropically? 
      • Remember to think creatively, nothing is off limits.
    • How do I measure the impact of my giving?

This process is complex and it is at this stage where potential philanthropists may feel overwhelmed or too busy. Like Elon Musk, the frustration leads to thinking that it is harder than it seems to donate money well. This is where a philanthropy consultant can take the frustration and complexity out of developing your giving strategy. A philanthropy consultant can bring back the joy in giving to ensure that it is the best thing you ever do.

This is what made Carnegie the father of modern philanthropy, he knew the profound personal drivers behind his philanthropy, then used these to inform and develop his overarching giving strategy.  “Carnegie boldly articulated [in The Gospel of Wealth] his view of the rich as mere trustees of their wealth who should live unostentatiously, provide moderately for their families, and use their fortunes to promote the ‘general good.'” (The Carnegie Corporation of New York). Further, he believed that “just giving away money was not enough….The problem, as he saw it, was ‘indiscriminate charity’—providing help to people who were unwilling to help themselves. That sort of philanthropy only rewarded bad habits rather than encouraging good ones.” He preferred to support charities “that strengthened and refreshed individuals so they could become more independent and productive themselves.” (The Philanthropy Roundtable)

 

The key to successful philanthropy

We speak a lot about impact when it comes to philanthropy and charitable organisations. What is the impact of your gift? What is the impact of the organisation’s programmes and mission? But have you asked yourself the most important question – how good do you feel about your giving?

It should be the best thing that you have ever done. If you achieve that, you will very much enjoy both the philanthropic journey and the point of destination. That is the key to successful philanthropy.

 

“No man becomes rich without himself enriching others.” – Andrew Carnegie

 


About the Author

Ben Morton Wright founded Global Philanthropic in 2002. He has supervised the establishment of Global Philanthropic operations in the UK, Australia, Hong Kong and Canada. As Group CEO, Mr Morton Wright has gained recognition as a major gift strategist, an expert in structuring international campaigns and a specialist on higher education and Asian philanthropy.

Currently, Mr Morton Wright advises a number of private individuals and philanthropists around the world to help them develop a meaningful philanthropic journey and strategy.

 

About Global Philanthropic

Global Philanthropic has convened some the world’s leading philanthropic organisations and academic institutions for Talking Philanthropy: Asia-Pacific – Supporting a Philanthropic Ecosystem on May 14th 2021. The theme for the forum will bring together leaders in philanthropy from the region and around the world to focus on the structural issues around philanthropy in Asia-Pacific. 

Talking Philanthropy will provide a macro perspective on the key issues that need to be addressed in the Asia-Pacific region to allow philanthropy to grow and flourish. We will discuss the wealth distribution and the dramatic growth of Ultra High Net Worth Individuals (UHNWIs), the roles of development organisations, NGOs, government and policy, philanthropists, and the charity sector in nurturing the philanthropic ecosystem. 

Our event partners include the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore, Centre for Strategic Philanthropy at Cambridge Judge Business School at the University of Cambridge, together with The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, United Nations Foundation, and the conservation charity, BirdLife International. BILLIONAIRE Magazine is the media partner.

At Global Philanthropic, we can facilitate a reflective discussion to connect areas of interest, value motivators, and creative ideas for your philanthropic giving. It is fascinating to see how this deeper dive into your personal motivators can drive some really creative ideas of giving and drive future giving with passion.

How might your profound personal drivers inform and develop your philanthropic journey? We have tools to help you define these principles and have experience working with philanthropists in creating a philanthropic journey that resonates with their personal profound drivers. 

Learn more at globalphilanthropic.com/talking-philanthropy and join the discussion.

Filed Under: Better Philanthropy, Growing Giving, How to do it

The UK Social Impact Investment Market – Part 2 of 3 from the Understanding Impact Investing series

March 3, 2021 by Beacon Admin

the uk social impact investment market

In a series of three articles, Scott Greenhalgh*, former executive chair of Bridges Evergreen Holdings, will share his thoughts on the landscape for impact investing in the UK. This second article looks at the UK social impact investment market and the different types of investment opportunities for investors.

* See bottom for more on the author

Missed the first article?


The UK Social Impact Investment Market

In the first article in this series, we looked at the Impact Investing Institute’s Spectrum of Capital and the ABC methodology that classifies investments as avoiding harm, benefitting stakeholders and contributing to solutions. 

To help define what we mean by social impact investment, we will use the Spectrum of Capital1 from the EVPA. A spectrum of capital offers a continuum on which to plot the purpose of an investment. At one end we have grant-making which seeks a social return and accepts the full “loss” of capital. At the other, we have traditional investment that considers only the two dimensions of risk and return, with no consideration of the social or environmental impact of the entity in which is invested. 

Between these two extremes, the spectrum depicts different investment approaches that embrace the three dimensions of risk, return and impact, with the focus on financial return increasing as we move from left to right.

This article focuses on the “UK social impact investment market”. Whilst not a perfect match, this part of the market is broadly consistent with the middle section below which the EVPA defines as Impact First Social Investment on its spectrum of capital2. This segment combines social investment (the funding of charities and not for profits) and impact first equity investing as described below.

Figure 1: Spectrum of Capital from the European Venture Philanthropy Association

Figure 2: Big Society Capital’s estimation of UK social impact investment market size

Impact first social investments include all return-seeking investment in socially driven businesses as well as lending to charities, social enterprises and socially driven businesses. It excludes at one end philanthropy, which of course makes no financial return, and at the other impact investment, that seeks a full market-rate return (known as finance first investment). 

Using a definition that is close to the EVPA one, Big Society Capital estimated the UK social impact investment market at £5 billion in 2019, having grown from £833m in 2011 and with over £1 billion of new commitments in each of the years 2017-2019. This is shown in Figure 2 (above). 

Figure 2 also highlights that the UK social impact investment market is dominated by social property investment and various forms of lending to charities and social businesses. These account for c 85% of the £5 billion total. 

Venture capital and equity investment into socially-driven businesses has grown but remains small at £473m in 2019. There are some 25 funds in this area, most are early-stage investors. The largest is Bridges Evergreen, which I ran, and which is a later stage investor with £51m of committed capital. Attracting private investors to these new funds has proved a challenge and for the sector to grow, more “enlightened” capital is needed.

There are a range of equity investment opportunities for private investors, but these are fund-based, as yet there are no impact equity angel networks. 

Outside of these statistics are a number of much larger sustainability and impact funds that seek market-rate returns. These include early stage “tech for good” investors such as Atomico, mid-market private equity style funds such as Palatine Impact and Bridges Sustainable Growth and the impact funds of major investment firms including those of Bain, TPG and KKR. The launch of more large impact funds is to be expected.

Also, outside of these statistics are ‘fund of fund’ investment opportunities such as the newly listed Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust plc that offers investors exposure to a number of the funds included in the above data, the Snowball fund of fund initiative and portfolios managed by impact focused wealth managers such as Tribe Impact and Rathbones Greenbank, where the investor can align the portfolio with their values and interests. 

As will be seen from the above, there are a range of opportunities for investors to invest into funds or entrust their investments to a small number of impact focused wealth managers or fund of funds. There are three broad areas that an investor might want to consider in more detail. 

 

Property and lending 

The segment of this market that has grown most rapidly in the past 5 years and now accounts for over 40% of the £5 billion total is property. Social property funds include listed vehicles such as Civitas Social Housing and Triple Point Social Housing REIT, off-shoots of major property firms such as CBRE and DTZ as well as social property specialists including Resonance and SASC that focus on funding property for charities. 

Social bank lending forms the second largest segment at around 35% of the total. This is provided by social purpose banks including Triodos, Charity Bank, CAF Bank and Unity Bank. Non-bank lending and the issuance of bonds by charities each account for some 6-7% of the total with much of the bond issuance undertaken via Triodos and Allia, a specialist social enterprise. 

These investments are often asset-backed and can be characterised as lower risk/lower return, with yields of between 3-5% pa. Investment liquidity is higher with the listed funds, medium based on matched bargains for many of the bond investments and low in illiquid private fund structures. 

 

Social Outcome Contracts

Social outcome contracts or SOCs are a new and innovative form of public sector contracting pioneered by Social Finance and Bridges Fund Management. The first such contract was in HMP Peterborough, a payment-by-results contract designed to reduce recidivism among those leaving Peterborough prison. 

Under a SOC, a public body- for example a local authority- issues a payment-by-results contract which, rather than specifying the service to be delivered, specifies the desired outcome. Payments are based on the extent of achievement of the specified outcomes. Investors fund the contract delivery and only if the specified outcomes are achieved, do the investors recoup their investment and achieve a financial return. In this way social impact success is linked to financial success. 

Outcome payments are set at a level that results in a net saving to the public purse; in other words, the cost of paying for outcomes is exceeded by the savings to the public purse through the intervention provided. Return targets are set at some 5-7% net for the investor and one of the attractions for investors is that these returns are dependent on contractual arrangements and therefore are not correlated with market factors.

In the UK, there have been to date some 80 SOCs, mainly investing in the themes of homelessness, vulnerable children and social prescribing (that is support to those with long-term health conditions). 

 

Venture and equity investments

This is the area of the social impact investment market where I hope to see considerable growth. Today, this segment includes some 25 small investment funds. Most are less than 8 years old and so have not been through a full fund cycle. Examples include funds from Impact Ventures UK, Nesta, Big Issue Invest and Bridges Evergreen. 

These funds invest to build Socially Driven Businesses, as depicted in the EVPA spectrum of capital. They are avowedly “impact first”, in other words while they seek an attractive financial return for the investor, they do not pursue return as a priority over the social or environmental impact of the investment. (I will focus more on the distinction between finance first and impact first investing in the third article in the series).

Most of these funds are early-stage investors. It follows that these are illiquid investments, higher risk as a result of the stage of investment and therefore attract investors willing to accept these risks in return for the potential high social impact that the funds can deliver. 

From my own experience of building a later stage impact first fund, it is possible to reduce investment risk and generate returns of around 9%+ net to the investor. It is also possible to reduce the risk profile of these later-stage investments and so offer the investor an attractive risk-adjusted return. (I will focus on how in the third article). The early-stage impact first funds could potentially generate much higher returns.

On the demand side, there are many mission-driven entrepreneurs seeking to build socially-driven businesses in the UK. These entrepreneurs will typically want to select their investment partner based on values alignment and support to be both commercially successful and deliver positive social impact, rather than on financial criteria alone. 

On the supply side, as many of the investment funds are small and lack a track record, it is hard for institutional investors to allocate meaningful capital to this sub-sector. So far, these funds have been championed by Big Society Capital and a small number of committed endowment funds and private HNW investors that want to see the impact first sector flourish. To enable this segment of the market to grow, it is imperative that the supply of capital increases, and this will most likely come from wealthy individual investors in the immediate future. We need more of them!

In the third and final article in the series, Scott looks in more depth at the distinction between finance first and impact first equity investing. 


Footnotes:

1. Source: European Venture Philanthropy Association

2. Please note this Spectrum of Capital differs from the Impact Institute one in the previous article.


About Scott Greenhalgh: After a career in private equity, Scott started working 12 years ago with a number of wonderful not-for-profit organisations that opened his eyes to the scale of social inequality and need in the UK. In 2016, he was fortunate to be able to combine these “two worlds” and lead Bridges Evergreen Holdings from inception. Evergreen is the UK’s first long-term capital investment vehicle for social impact investing. Scott is now stepping down from this role and this series of articles offer reflections on leading a pioneering impact first fund. The views in this article are the author’s own and expressed in a personal capacity.

Filed Under: Giving vehicles, Growing Giving, How to do it, Impact investing

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Go to Next Page »

In May 2025 The Beacon Collaborate merged with NPC. © 2025 Beacon Fellowship Charitable Trust | Registered charity, Charity No 1096423, Reg in England No 4689391 | EDI policy | Privacy policy | Website by Charity & Biscuits

  • LinkedIn